Chaos Magick section?

[Accipeveldare]

I might be wrong but I have not seen a section dedicated to chaos Magick. I think it would be a very reasonable and amazing thing to add due to the significance of chaos Magick in the esoteric community.

 

[Robert Ramsay]

Funny, I always assumed there was a Chaos Magick section, but now I look, I see that there isn't!

Mandela Effect in 3... 2... 1...

 

[SkullTraill]

I may have to add one since there is a decent volume of chaos magick threads.

 

[Kepler]

To talk over knowing SMI²LEs.

Spoiler: V'ger

 

[SirDrWizardProfessor]

I might be wrong but I have not seen a section dedicated to chaos Magick. I think it would be a very reasonable and amazing thing to add due to the significance of chaos Magick in the esoteric community.

I agree. I'm new to the site, but have only seen random posts with books or topics related to chaos magic, but not a dedicated section.

 

[FireBorn]

It's ALL Chaos Magick muahahaha! Nvm

 

[MorganBlack]

I dig it!

Uh, ya'll, if we're voting, can it be something maybe like, just off the top of my head.

'Chaos Magic, Models, and Meta-Models'

I can tell people sense we need a way speak on a conceptual level a little bit above the colorful sublunar Carnivale of daimons, god-forms and spirits without stepping on other people's highly personal theurgic or sacramental-emotional practices. (Of course, outrage is a great enagement tool. cough ) A place to chat about first principles, our attempts to model them, "above" the sublunar laser light and fog show.

New Thought. NeoPlatonism can go there, A lot of quantum atheists also fit there. Non-visionary (non-astral , agnostic ) Therevada Bhuddist practices, NeoPlatonic Sufic practices , both without being labeled as a neo-Theosophcal "RHP" or "LHP". Even concern trolling about reeee-gores is trying to get there.

 

[Rusty64]

I may have to add one since there is a decent volume of chaos magick threads.

In my head I feel like it should get one because it kinda exists outside of RHP and LHP practices Its a distinct idology(although I'm what they biologists would desribe as a "splitter" I perfer having more small catagories than few big ones), perhaps the board could also include general non-dual discussion.