Yes. Definitely.
In general, this is the way I'm doing it:
Just like any practitioner, it begins with observation, ideally an interview. Collecting signs and symptoms, family history and most important consent. After that it's root-cause-analysis. Then, to put it bluntly, I invoke the root-cause with-in myself in a sort of sand-box and play with it until I've gotten to know it sufficiently to deconstruct it. Once I'm able to deconstruct it for myself, I join the afflicted in their world, and show them how to deconstruct it for themself. Where it differs from conventional therapy is the invocation, the manner in which I am "joining in their world", and the techniques I'm using for deconstruction.
Ultimately, successfully helping people in this way is a function of 3 things:
- how well the practitioner knows themself
- how well the practitioner knows the afflicted
- the number of afflictions known and understood to the extent of deconstructing them
In particular, these two, I start looking for trauma. Unresolved painful memories. Metaphorical "inflammation" which is sapping their resources. In the past, many used a "demon possession" model which had some therapeutic benefit. I prefer using an inflammation model instead, but, in function, it's still ... the same "old-religion". The metaphorical "demons" which are afflicting them are metaphorically "named" and metaphorically "banished" over and over again.