How do you see the author's view on Shani Bhakti in relation or contradiction to the tantric view of Moksha?Fucking dark. Heavy. Tamasic, as we say in tantra. I focused on Shani, as that is the easiest "real-world" analogue of Saturn currently still in existence. I also have some teaching from my guru in a basic Shani mantra (similar to the one in the book) and it still increased my depression/"inner darkness" in ways that kinda suck ass. That said, bhakti with Shanidev is always going to be challenging.
I agree 100% regarding the nonsense of the conspiracy stuff etc. I was asking about experiences that people may have had, who engaged with the contents of the book.If you are talking about Arthur Moros' book, it would be better to move the threat to the book discussions. Granted, I haven't read this specific book, but I heard a few good words about its content.
However! A big, giant however. Be warned that the whole idea of the Black Cube of Saturn is also full of pseudo-occult conspiracy theory nonsense. This isn't the right forum to discuss it either, and I would personally stay away from any source that puts "Black Cube" and "Saturn" in a single sentence. Same with any sources trying to claim that "Saturn" and "Satan" are directly related.