• Hi guest! As you can see, the new Wizard Forums has been revived, and we are glad to have you visiting our site! However, it would be really helpful, both to you and us, if you registered on our website! Registering allows you to see all posts, and make posts yourself, which would be great if you could share your knowledge and opinions with us! You could also make posts to ask questions!

A History of Modern Astrology

Firetree

Disciple
Joined
Jan 13, 2026
Messages
766
Reaction score
983
Awards
5
Historically .... 'just taking the Sun sign' never had the significance it has today . It would have been what was on the ASC ; ie at 0 degrees - your 'eastern horizon ' ; the 'first house' and not just what 'sign' was behind that house but any planet (which the signs and houses 'energies' of 'flavors' were based on anyway ) near 0 degrees would give the 'overall nature' that some see the 'Sun's sign' doing today . Even today one's 'Sun sign' is not considered to match the physical appearance of a person , it would be their 'rising sign' ; what sign (or planet ) is in the first house .

Eg . if one was born when Leo was on the eastern horizon ( the 1st house and Ascendant ), at Dawn ( the Sun is there too ) they might look like Brian Blessed

1841.jpg


But the main resultant calculation was the angular relationship , the 'aspects' between the planets .

A bit more history ; How did this change ? Blame Brian Naylor in 1930 when he started the ' horror ' of 'horrorscopes ' in the newspaper and was done to make crappy newspaper predictions possible by dividing everyone up into 12 groups . AND he 'was' a Leo ( Not only that he recalculated his rising sign so he could become a Virgo rising ... thus indicating his balance and fairness ;) )
But how did he ever get that job in the first place ? he made predictions about Princess Margaret ; she will have an 'Eventful life' ... really ! A princess ?? An eventful life ? Turns out people thought she did and her 'bohemian lifestyle ' as they said back then also was fodder for the newspaper reading public . But he clinched it with the “events of tremendous importance to the Royal Family and the nation will come about near her seventh year '' ... when she was 6 Uncle (King) Edward nicked off with an American 'divorcee' . Then he sorta predicted the R101 airship disaster and the Sunday Express gave him a weekly column and the newspaper got flooded by personal requests for predictions and he came up with the 12 division idea to deal with all the requests ( near 28,000 per day ! ) .

But Naylor didnt start all this , he was just the most influential, he lifted the idea off William Allen , who was also a Leo ( and even changed his name to Leo .... Damn Leos , always gotta interfere and change everything with their big egos :) ) . Alan ' Leo ' began the shift toward focusing on the Sun sign in the late 19th century because it made his mail-order astrology booklets easier to write distribute and read . It was all about money and marketing . Actually , Allen 'Leo' made the world's first mass-market commercial astrology .

'' Leo dramatically shifted the focus toward psychology and character analysis. He famously re-branded astrology as the "science of tendencies, arguing that a birth chart reveals a person's inner potential rather than an unchangeable fate.

Before that , there was no 'feelgood solutions ' , no 'everyone is a winner ! ' if you had a badly aspected ( that is the angular relationships between planets ) chart , you were f***ed ! hence the old adage ; 'born under a bad sign ' .

But he HAD to make those switch because otherwise he would have been prosecuted for predictions ( under the Witchcraft act of 1735 ; getting money for making predictions about the future ) he also was in Theosophical society so it all got mixed in with 'spirituality' western ideas about 'karma' and 'reincarnation' and birthed 'astrology' into the ' New Age '

He navigated through a few legal trials , relying on his 'psychological ' use of astrology and its 'flexible outcomes' ( so not really predicting a set future ) He got acquitted in 1914 but in 1917 busted for, what was clearly , a definite prediction in a book . He then went into a furious panic attempting to rewrite and scour through everything he wrote to change it to avoid further prosecution but that blew his brain up ; 6 weeks after his conviction, while doing this rewriting , he died of a cerebral hemorrhage at the age of 67 .

Apparently Gustav Holtz was inspired by him to compose 'The Planets ' .
 

stalkinghyena

Labore et Constantia
Benefactor
Vendor
Joined
Jul 10, 2022
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
2,318
Awards
13
I do recall discussions of Alan Leo, but never dug deep, so I appreciate the run down. Of course fudging the Ascendent makes sense for a market persona. When I looked at Isabelle M Hickey's horoscope, I was baffled by the utter perfection - so many planets in domicile, and all the aspects so harmonious. I suppose that if I lingered on it longer, I would find the signifying points of a beehive hairdo.

My understanding since listening to Chris Brennan, Austin Coppock and others bringing back traditional astrology, is the point of the Ascendant is "where you came in". That is, it is the point of entry of the soul, and this the "real you", the eternal being that is now constrained to the clock of flesh and bone.
Next in importance was the Moon's sign as this was indicative of the body type and general health, the clock in its most obvious rhythms, for the reader anyway.
Third was the Sun sign, which symbolized one's intellect, though not in the same sense as Mercury, which symbolized one's intelligence, among other things. I think the distinction there is more personality on one side vs. capability on the other, but I could be wrong. Yet I feel of the person, the Sun would be the most visible sense one can get, due to its brightness as chief luminary - though this would seem to contradict the First House as framing the general person. Though I think most people tend to see the most obvious and memorable thing about someone, so I guess there's a fit. All this I have said being very broad and general, of course. Deeper astrology has a lot of nuance to it.

I always figured the modern emphasis on the Sun sign became so popular because it is easy enough to fit into a newspaper column on one hand, and it serves as a quick identifier for people on the other. That is, it serves the quick perception, the easiest mode. Modern life is so fast, and Fate seems so determined by immediacy, that I think the adaptation of astrology to pop culture the way it has been done is reflective of the needs of the larger culture. Instead of being a tool of coping with Fate, it becomes a soothing balm. However, I do prefer tendencies over and against deterministic prediction as I am not in the proper sense a Stoic.
 

Firetree

Disciple
Joined
Jan 13, 2026
Messages
766
Reaction score
983
Awards
5
:D loved the beehive hair comment :)


a similar natal chart for the girls in B52s :)


3280.jpg
 
Top