Retarded Christians Once Again Censoring Books

[Yazata]

I think if you listen to the quote from the book in the video linked above and think that is similar to the text of the Song of Songs you are not serious.

 

[Morell]

I think if you listen to the quote from the book in the video linked above and think that is similar to the text of the Song of Songs you are not serious.

Possible. Cannot tell, my browser doesn't load the video.

 

[Durward]

Comparing a book that teaches morals to a book that describes the pleasures of gay anal sex is a great point.

LMFAO to 'teaching morals'... wow. Somebody thinks fake morals and ethics taught by men claiming it comes from a misogynistic Sky Santa are somehow ok, after thousands of years of murder and mayhem done in the name of that exact horrible book. Millions of deaths. Slavery. This is the way... sure. But it somehow is better than books describing sexual encounters? The Inquisition is suddenly morals and ethics? Forcing religions on people with the threat of death is so moral and ethical. All these priests molesting children, so moral and ethical.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Yazata]

I thought the topic of this thread was books that were being banned (but in reality are simply being withheld from young children)
But it seems neither one of you bothered to listen to the quotes. Just be angry at those mean Christians..

 

[Beyond Everything]

Comparing a book that teaches morals

lol the book that teaches genocide and slavery? lol

Post automatically merged: Feb 7, 2026

I thought the topic of this thread was books that were being banned (but in reality are simply being withheld from young children)

Other critics say the bill would create barriers for students in schools that don’t have libraries or have limited book collections. Five of the Des Moines School District’s schools do not have libraries and about 12,000 middle and high school students use their school ID cards at Des Moines Public Libraries

 

[Durward]

I thought the topic of this thread was books that were being banned (but in reality are simply being withheld from young children)
But it seems neither one of you bothered to listen to the quotes. Just be angry at those mean Christians..

My part was about the false assumption that these same people, who are making the bans, are mostly White Christian Nationalists who thump children on the head with that horrible book, and brainwash them using this book full of hatred and division, incest, murder, genocide and more, with threats and usually fear of hell. This is the ultimate of the pot calling the kettle black. Some of these same folks are slowly being arrested for child porn, incest, rape, murder, abuse and more. There is a huge failure in what they think they stand for, and most of them are horrible and abusive parents that should be in jail.

The point is actually;
There is nothing wrong with making certain books age-appropriate only, and putting them in a section that you can't enter. And you can't even check them out unless you are old enough.
There is also nothing wrong with making parents responsible for parenting, and not forcing the rest of the public to face banned printed materials because of your own bad parenting or bad management of a library. Banning books is plain and simple NAZI FASCIST BS.

In addition, creating any law because of your own religion should make that religion banned in the USA, because we separate church and State here, for a reason. We can't let one cult or the other try to create bans and laws based on some hate and division cult idea. We are not an oppressed Nation that belongs to any Abrahamic cult, and we will fight back when people try to introduce that sick idea.
Aren't the current riots in Abrahamic cult countries enough for people to see what happens when you lead with religious zealots?
If you let them ban things now, they won't stop until they control the media and free speech. It is that, and not the whining baby, poor me, Christian issues, where they think they need special protections so they can continue to force this sick and twisted agenda of hate and division on the rest of the planet, while calling it love thy neighbor.

The idea of these books falling in the hands of children is plainly a supervision problem, which is a library or parent problem, and not something that should ever lead to banning books of any kind. Anything leading to a ban needs to be fought immediately, with extreme prejudice.
And, if we are banning books, let's start with the Bible, the Koran, and any other book that has caused so much war and death, and stop worrying about sexual items that children got from the Internet long before any library visit.

 

[Yazata]

12,000 middle and high school students use their school ID cards at Des Moines Public Libraries

And that is the same as banning books?

Post automatically merged: Feb 7, 2026

There is nothing wrong with making certain books age-appropriate only, and putting them in a section that you can't enter. And you can't even check them out unless you are old enough.

Well, we agree then.

 

[Durward]

And that is the same as banning books?

Post automatically merged: Feb 7, 2026

Well, we agree then.

Still a far cry from the current banning that has been going on. Controlling the media is still an issue, and so is banning printed materials. The approach to fixing the issue is the issue. The people in charge are a huge issue.

 

[Morell]

I thought the topic of this thread was books that were being banned (but in reality are simply being withheld from young children)
But it seems neither one of you bothered to listen to the quotes. Just be angry at those mean Christians..

...
Guess that you are right.

...hehehe, do they realize that kids have access to the internet way sooner than access to the library?

 

[diana_i_gusarova]

In Russia, the authorities have also begun to persecute occultists. Advertising of Tarot reading is prohibited as "damaging to the mental health of the population." One witch received two years in prison "for insulting the feelings of believers" in her books. All references to Satanism are prohibited, as the Russian State Duma has invented the "international extremist Satanist movement." Satanists in modern Russia are equated with ISIS terrorists. In general, we all live in a fun time, my friends. Let's hold on to each other and help each other. Let's win together!

 

[Hydor]

" The three little witches" A children's book was banned from public school libraries in my home state years ago. We had a copy at home.

"Zoe, Zara, and Ziggy have a series of adventures while arranging a midnight Halloween party, featuring acro-bats, beetleburgers, and a few surprises, for all of their friends in the Magic Wood"

 

[Rynnshng]

If I recall, it is discussed in Diary of a Devilworshipper Vol 4, how sexual repression by religion is not an arbitrary moral reflex, it is a tactic designed to create killers who will serve in the armies of the Magi, as soldiers whose frustration and anger comes out on the battlefield in extreme cruelty and ferocity to strike fear into the opposing enemy, which increases the reputation of terror of the Magi by its enemies and thus engenders more likely capitulation to their insane schemas. It's a very old game. Thus, you see in society hyper-reaction to sexuality that acts through repression and engineered moral outrage, while the sanction and worship of ultra-violence is vaunted as sacred. Even so, media infantilises the masses through refusing to show graphic scenes of either. If they did, many might not be so complacent or neurotic.

It is an ancient practice mired in power and control exhibiting itself as hypocrisy but intended as a stratagem to mould masses. For instance, in Australia it is illegal for women to bare their chest and show their breasts - unless - it is for an art exhibition, permitted protest, or for breast-feeding. Yet, any man, of any age can bare his chest when and wherever he so chooses. Feminism long recognizes these torturous inconsistencies for what they are;- Tyranny.

It is important for people to understand such social (moral) movements as 'weaponisations' against people.

 

[SleipnirTheHorse]

My mother's a Christian and I love her, but the Bible in the OT there's "Samaria shall bear her guilt, because she has rebelled against her God; they shall fall by the sword; their little ones shall be dashed in pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open." Hosea 13:16 infanticide and
abortion and yes AI is telling this could be prophecy, but my Cutie Mark... erm instincts are telling me this is something the Israelites did back in the day to their enemies' children and babes and there's the David and Jonathan story which I'm pretty sure is a homosexual romance and I can get Rabbis to back me up if you like, there's also in the NT the part were Paul makes an insulting reference to Oral Sex, and his weird rants about Roman Orgies. It gets even wilder with the Traditional Ages, with Joseph being 90 and Mary being 13 and that's just in the NT, also there's the story Salome who dances a sexy dance before uncle who is also her step-father which ends in a beheading (MAN THE ISRAELITES WERE CRAY CRAY) and even better the Talmud adds an interesting detail to when Adam goes around seeing the animals to see if their good companions, he according to Jewish Text tested them for a "certain skill" according some critics of Judaism (which I choose to treat just every other critic of every religion like every critic of every other religion due to I know what bigotry actually means.) And this is only a fraction of the inappropriate stuff in the Jewish and Christian Bibles.

Would you believe I have personally met a Liberal Rabbi who is trying to get the Bible banned to make a statement, he's talked about all sorts of stuff in the Old Testament, yes my friends my power to cite inappropriate Bible Passages is still limited.... BUT SOON!

 

[Jsinclair]

The math tells me that these parents grew up with the rapidly evolving technology that culminated in what we have today. They must know that with ten minutes of determined effort by a reasonably intelligent young person there really aren't ANY restrictions to the material accessible online. Not by parental controls, not by online verification systems, not by one damn thing. Now, once the peculiar form of mental illness that accompanies parenthood sets in, do they suddenly forget what THEY did online? No. No they do not. In fact, I propose that it is BECAUSE of what they did online that they are reacting the way that they are. The shame now attached to these remembered acts - usually engendered by their sudden religious/moralistic convictions, combined with the aforementioned DSM-V salad served up with parenthood - is what drives them towards going after the low-hanging fruit that they are. These attempts to impose control is a reaction to their perceived loss/lack of control in regards to online material/technology - specifically, their own actions (past or present) and certain knowledge of similar actions by others. So, in a desperate (and predictable) attempt to avoid honest self-reflection (and the truly meaningful and beneficial actions resulting therefrom), they go about battling the dark knights and deadly windmills that are, in the final analysis, their own projections.

Typical.