• Hi guest! As you can see, the new Wizard Forums has been revived, and we are glad to have you visiting our site! However, it would be really helpful, both to you and us, if you registered on our website! Registering allows you to see all posts, and make posts yourself, which would be great if you could share your knowledge and opinions with us! You could also make posts to ask questions!

So, what exactly is a demon?

Faria

Zealot
Joined
Jan 23, 2024
Messages
143
Reaction score
235
Awards
2
the Abrahamic God, who himself, in his own sacred text, has brought his own fair share of death, destruction, and deception to both his own followers, and those of other nations.
Yes. That is the idea behind pretty much all the grimoires. Those spirits aren't in there to be extracted and treated as your buddy. They are there as a list of entities who submit to, or are overpowered by Jehovah. If that's not your thing, don't mess with Buer or any of them. Do something pagan-ish instead. As far as I am aware, there is no pagan equivalent to grimoire type spirit summoning, so the only context in which any of those demons have relevance is the one in which they are subject to the will of Jehovah.

Most of the grimoire authors were probably aware of that sort of thing and didn't want their work to be so closely identified with God in the way that church presented the idea. They go to great lengths to make clear that their version of God is ineffable, all-powerful, all-knowing, the only God that exists and to which everything that exists is subject. They use the name Tetragrammaton to express that, a divine identity beyond all conceptions of divinity. Maybe it's not dressed up in Islamic or Hebrew or Latin terminology, but the supremacy of that God is central to grimoire conjuration.
 

IllusiveOwl

Disciple
Joined
Apr 29, 2024
Messages
596
Reaction score
1,187
Awards
11
we've been unconsciously conditioned by materialist assumptions (the product of the era we happen to live in) that privilege physical reality over psychic reality, despite Jung's insight that the psyche operates according to its own laws and possesses a reality as concrete and consequential as anything in the "this" world.
I think there's been a misunderstanding, that's my fault. I'm not arguing that psychic phenomena aren't "real", I'm arguing hermetically that nothing is "real", material or psychic, that both are manifestations of a higher "actually real" reality. In fact in my original post, I said that these demonic entities most often interact with us through the imagination and psyche, however that is not their origin.

The material is just as non-existent as the psychic reality, both are manifestations, undulations, of a prima-materia. Matter is condensed energy, and energy itself is a relation between positive and negative forces that are, in themselves, a single phenomena. Psychic "reality" is a much more subtle and just as present one as the material, you think as a result of neurons firing in your head and the processes of the material that make up your brain and sensory organs, but thinking itself is just an analysis program that runs on words, it isn't the whole - or even center of your experience - and based on how you think about a situation, you feel certain colors of emotions, which are just as real and not real. Emotions are a single thing that takes on many different forms, like water, and thoughts are the glass that shape it; if one person sees another getting hit, one person will feel compassionate sorrow and another will feel an elating sense of justice. Because of this, you could argue that emotions in themselves are a kind of prima-materia that take shape just as physical reality does with energy.

You could likely tell by my profile picture that I'm a fan of Jung and understand to a degree what he was talking about, but he never really honed in on the underlying source underneath all phenomena, he had no ground, and so he was thrown about by psychic activities to a level most of us couldn't imagine, to a point where his inner world was just as real as the outer world. The fact that he was able to attune to his psychic world doesn't change anything of what I was saying, or imply that the psychic world is more real or better than the outer world.

The insistence that demons, angels, gods, whatever must exist as completely objective, external beings is ultimately a psychological cope - it can be a terrifying possibility that we ourselves might be the primary source of both the divine and demonic forces in our lives is so unbearable that we'd rather populate the universe with independent entities than face the full weight of our own psychological depths.
This statement is a little amusing, as relegating all divine & demonic beings as psychic phenomena and purely internal events that exist solely within us is also a psychological cope, and is human self-centered arrogance in it's own right. I fire back that this kind of nihilistic "we are the only form of sentient life in the universe" nonsense is illogical, given how ancient and incomprehensible the cosmos is even in this scientific age. The external world shapes our inner world to a profound degree, and aside from cases of insanity, they mirror each other. Would it not make sense that beings who exist that are made of intangible substances, could have influence and interact with us through intangible means, such as the psyche, yet also have an existence from without it?
anyone who has even scratched the surface of their own unconscious knows it contains entire universes, having seemingly infinite depth and ability to shape our experienced reality that the question of external entities becomes almost secondary.
The question of external entities becomes secondary? This sounds like madness, of falling into the mind at the expense of objective reality, much like Jung did. I am aware of the vastness of the inner world, but it is just as infinite as the external world. Your condition places you at the center of both worlds, you have infinity all around you, to prize one over the other is silly.

There are many traditions that call the universe a "dream", that the underlying quantum field that time & space itself can melt into is "mind". This theory is in your favor, meaning that dreams are just as real as reality itself, however that makes the objective reality just as real as well.

Your argument or theory doesn't disprove the objective existence of demonic or angelic hyperdimensional entities. I would like to elaborate further: spiritual development is a movement towards "the Self", and there are two ways - that I know of - to do this, that is to go internally and know the capital-S-Self of existence through your own inner flame that is a spark of it, or by going externally and recognizing the same self in all beings and creation, at all levels of creation. You could argue that by the nature of the paths, one is inherinetly self-centered and selfish, while the other is all-centered and selfless. Demonic entities would simply be beings who are going down the Left Hand Path, those who become powerful by a connection with the Self through themselves at the expense of all others. They could be beings who have risen from materiality, or having been intangible since the beginning of material creation, in fact, I believe existence was going on before the Big Bang, and that was simply the beginning of time as we understand it in this material universe, because "something" existing from "nothing" makes a lot less sense than material existence having roots in an already existing immaterial one, who knows. I'm simply saying that non-tangible beings are more than likely out there, they don't just exist in your head, that our psyches are not the center of the universes.

I'm sorry for bringing about this feud.
Don't be silly, forums exist for debate and the sharing of conflicting ideas.
 

SinisterYT

Neophyte
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
A reflection of your subconscious. Ever had a dream? How real everything feels?
So, invoking a Demon is just edgy therapy basically? So why are you here? I'm genuinely asking because in your world view, I don't really understand the point on demonic invocation if you just believe it's all imagination
 

Kepler

Zealot
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
244
Reaction score
91
Awards
3
In my general hylozoic metaphysics, after removing most other definitions for the term, it's an egregore(interdimensional entity as a product of bios) resulting from life's experience with the apparent appearance of a discrete arrangement of physical qualities in the natural world that turned out to be false and fallen from astronomical alignment. These contrasts with Angels that are in heavenly alignment.

Yet, many Demons still retain some cohesion. As a falsehood that leads to truth, a processor in the crucible of the soul. Sometimes positioned zodiacally connecting the entity to all sorts of specific conditions related to life's experiences from the individual to the national.
To survive the demon provides service and consume the souls of those that access their qualities(siddhis). In doing so removing the source of that bios from reincarnation and advancing the remaining forms of life by improving conditions through consuming demonically aligned souls and returning that material of the soul for the souls of others to realign, integrate and put on a proper vector.
Sometime the demon realigns and returns to Angelic.
 

SinisterYT

Neophyte
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
In my general hylozoic metaphysics, after removing most other definitions for the term, it's an egregore(interdimensional entity as a product of bios) resulting from life's experience with the apparent appearance of a discrete arrangement of physical qualities in the natural world that turned out to be false and fallen from astronomical alignment. These contrasts with Angels that are in heavenly alignment.

Yet, many Demons still retain some cohesion. As a falsehood that leads to truth, a processor in the crucible of the soul. Sometimes positioned zodiacally connecting the entity to all sorts of specific conditions related to life's experiences from the individual to the national.
To survive the demon provides service and consume the souls of those that access their qualities(siddhis). In doing so removing the source of that bios from reincarnation and advancing the remaining forms of life by improving conditions through consuming demonically aligned souls and returning that material of the soul for the souls of others to realign, integrate and put on a proper vector.
Sometime the demon realigns and returns to Angelic.
So you’re saying that every entity ever all stems from humans? I’m trying to understand why people think we are the center of the universe when we are barely a dot in the long timeline of the universe’s existence

I have a herd time believing that—I agree that some may have came into existence that way but not all.
 

Kepler

Zealot
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
244
Reaction score
91
Awards
3
So you’re saying that every entity ever all stems from humans? I’m trying to understand why people think we are the center of the universe when we are barely a dot in the long timeline of the universe’s existence

I have a herd time believing that—I agree that some may have came into existence that way but not all.
From life(bios), not only human.
 

SinisterYT

Neophyte
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
From life, not only human.
So species ranging from Heterometrous spinifer to Homo-erectus created these beings? Why is it so hard for people to admit they can be independent beings that pre-date Animals. Or did Plants and Fungi make demons too?
 

Kepler

Zealot
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
244
Reaction score
91
Awards
3
So species ranging from Heterometrous spinifer to Homo-erectus created these beings? Why is it so hard for people to admit they can be independent beings that pre-date Animals. Or did Plants and Fungi make demons too?
To life on other planets. Any and every form of life informs the cosmos.

Such a thing as demons from zoe is nonsense as it results in infinite regress.

Are you familiar with the hylozoic terms of "bios" and "zoe"?
 

SinisterYT

Neophyte
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
To life on other planets. Any and every form of life informs the cosmos.

Such a thing as demons from zoe is nonsense as it results in infinite regress.

Are you familiar with the hylozoic terms of "bios" and "zoe"?
Demons from zoe is nonsense.”


And that part lowkey rubs me the wrong way, ’cause it makes a weird distinction like only some life “counts” in spiritual influence.

But if you’re gonna say all life informs the cosmos, then don’t suddenly draw a hard line and say zoe (life force itself) can’t birth beings — that’s just arbitrary gatekeeping dressed up as metaphysics
 

Kepler

Zealot
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
244
Reaction score
91
Awards
3
Demons from zoe is nonsense.”


And that part lowkey rubs me the wrong way, ’cause it makes a weird distinction like only some life “counts” in spiritual influence.

But if you’re gonna say all life informs the cosmos, then don’t suddenly draw a hard line and say zoe (life force itself) can’t birth beings — that’s just arbitrary gatekeeping dressed up as metaphysics
Birth demons as previously defined. Not beings as you are mistakenly reading and setting up as your strawman.
 

SinisterYT

Neophyte
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Birth demons as previously defined. Not beings as you are mistakenly reading and setting up as your strawman.
I’m not “setting” anything up. I’m simply trying to understand your logic

If all life informs the cosmos, why dismiss the idea that primordial life-force (“zoe”) could generate beings? You arbitrarily accept “bios” (conscious life), but not “zoe” (raw life essence)—which is funny because many esoteric systems do attribute spirit birth to raw vital forces.

You’re kinda gatekeeping metaphysics with your own internal definitions, then gaslighting me by calling my pushback a “strawman.” Nah bro. I’m just being consistent.
 

Kepler

Zealot
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
244
Reaction score
91
Awards
3
I’m not “setting” anything up. I’m simply trying to understand your logic

If all life informs the cosmos, why dismiss the idea that primordial life-force (“zoe”) could generate beings? You arbitrarily accept “bios” (conscious life), but not “zoe” (raw life essence)—which is funny because many esoteric systems do attribute spirit birth to raw vital forces.

You’re kinda gatekeeping metaphysics with your own internal definitions, then gaslighting me by calling my pushback a “strawman.” Nah bro. I’m just being consistent.
If you're trying to understand, read more carefully and take an hour or two to think before replying. You're replying to your assumptions.
 

SinisterYT

Neophyte
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
If you're trying to understand, read more carefully and take an hour or two to think before replying.
Yeah just wave the white flag—now you are just trying to be rude because you can’t push back on what I’m asking. Saying “I don’t know” or simply not replying would suffice.
 

Kepler

Zealot
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
244
Reaction score
91
Awards
3
Yeah just wave the white flag—now you are just trying to be rude because you can’t push back on what I’m asking. Saying “I don’t know” or simply not replying would suffice.
It's not that at all. You're jumping to conclusions still.
 

SinisterYT

Neophyte
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
You're losing all sense. The demons are dissolving you.
Why are you being so rude? “Solid copy” just means “I understand” in military language.

“the demons are dissolving you” not going outside will do that as well my man.

Are you going to try and have a conversation still or continue to use ad hominem fallacies to try and provoke me and brush your ego?
 

Kepler

Zealot
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
244
Reaction score
91
Awards
3
Why are you being so rude? “Solid copy” just means “I understand” in military language.

“the demons are dissolving you” not going outside will do that as well my man.

Are you going to try and have a conversation still or continue to use ad hominem fallacies to try and provoke me and brush your ego?
You're arguing with your own assumptions. You've seemed agitated from your first reflexive response to me, and all those following. Like demons are making you speak on their behalf. No one is being rude to you. Your accusation appears to be projection.

You seem to need that last word to give you a false sense of victory...so go ahead and find that exit.
 

SinisterYT

Neophyte
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
“You're losing coherence. The demons are dissolving you.”

“read more carefully and take an hour or two to think before replying”

Are you trying to offend Demons or Me I don’t even know at this point😂 not even a quarter into this “conversation” you started clearly being rude….not even an argument there. It’s not even about just Demons—I’m talking about Spirits in general.

professional gaslighting
 

Kepler

Zealot
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
244
Reaction score
91
Awards
3
“You're losing coherence. The demons are dissolving you.”

“read more carefully and take an hour or two to think before replying”

Are you trying to offend Demons or Me I don’t even know at this point😂 not even a quarter into this “conversation” you started clearly being rude….not even an argument there. It’s not even about just Demons—I’m talking about Spirits in general.

professional gaslighting
Now that my pause in responses forced you to take a time out after your predictable reflexive response, maybe you spent some time contemplating the matter and sorted your emotions.

My explanation for my metaphysics regarding the nature of demons does none of the accusations you're making. Gatekeeping? That accusation doesn't even make sense. That with the others are all a projection of your imagination which you're reacting emotionally to. In a sense you're lashing out at your own imagined demons. Letting them control what you see and how you respond. Which is simply being contrarian. You've shown no indication of having any more than a googled in the moment understanding about what you're talking about.

However, if you made your own post where you set down independently your well considered metaphysics about the nature of demons, that will show your understanding and help others, like myself, gain insight into what you're talking about.

The thread topic is about demons specifically, not spirits in general. If there is a distinction for you, as there is for others.
 
Top