[Opinion] Stance -- what it is, what it ain't, and how ta get some.

[Lucien6493]

Stance is like a cobra. It does not argue. It does not prevaricate. It shows up and the room re-arranges itself, just like magick, though it does not concern itself overly much with either theory or praxis, these being the prettily woven chiasm of twin serpents to the right and to the left of the winged staff of Mercury, creating by their crossing over the gates through which power flows like a Uraeus. And if the staff be that of a king, stance will see fit to envenomate and to devour them, even as Moses cast his staff before Pharaoh. So it is best to approach the subject with obliquity, for it is in the angle that the secret of the art is concealed.

Now, stance might instantiate spontaneously if the witch comes from an established lineage, such as the Judaic or the Neoplatonic, but only then if it has become so deeply embedded that it verges on proprioception. In other words, if it becomes the medium through which you move; if it becomes the eyes of the world you look through and not something of which you are consciously aware then it can be said that stance has devoured the twin serpents of theory and praxis. And don't get me wrong here. The eye through which you see, the medium through which you move is the in-forming of a living spiritual tradition, stance arising out of that as an emergent condition. To turn this around is to invoke the dark angel. You cannot practice stance. You cannot bring it about. You cannot imitate it, nor can you inherit it like your family jewels, for stance is sovereignty, and sovereignty is nothing special.

In the good old days of plague, decapitations and other sundry pleasures stance simply meant knowing your allotted place within the great chain of being. It was knowing where you stood. In fact, it gave you a place to stand. Your own place, vouchsafed by the divine, and from which nothing, be it in heaven, on earth or below it could move you. To come from stance, then, is in modern parlance to place the inertia of the entire creation behind your Will, by divine fiat. Everything else is optional because when you stand within the inviolate integrity of your own being magick is no longer something that you do. It becomes something that you inhabit. This, anyway is how I read all of those endless orisons in our beloved grims....as orientation, as positioning. But, well, most of us don't live in that world anymore, a world where reality itself was ensouled, and where spirits walked with us, but we can ground ourselves to the vertical axis without collapsing the one into the other, and that is where belief comes in. I will leave it at that for now.

 

[jbyer]

You should reconsider your stance on gatekeeping/psuedo intellectualism, try and keep things short and concise.

 

[Morell]

A little confused indeed.

It confuses me linguistically, at least. Guess that you might not be native English speaker. The term "stance" is used for physical position of the body. When it comes to mind, opinions and such, the right term is "standing."

...you could also be describing the "sense of belonging," or "belonging" in short.

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 7:13 PM

Also for describing place of your standing in society is "standing" too...

 

[MorganBlack]

I got what Lucien was saying just fine. I think. The real fun is in the exploration. The provocation.

The people I usually can't tell what the fuck they going on about are the neopagans and Witchtokers. They usually have no detectable metaphysic. I know they think they are saying something communicable, but it all just sounds like baby-gargle to me. And if you ask them what they hell they mean they act smug. But I don't come at them and call them gatekeepers, and they certainly are cramped and confusing.

Mystical writings usually use a twilight language with "nonsensical," provocative, or suggestive imagery. Would you really prefer to be spoon-fed? Jump to Sunbtack. You an have TONS of said very sincere, very nice, very academic spoon-feeding. And sometimes it just takes fucking takes forever to find the historical ideas that communicate gnosis - but I got him. Sometimes you just gotta sing it.

As a Neoplatonist of the Iamblichan sort I have to admit Platonism really could use updating with Dr. Jeffrey Kripal’s Dual-Aspect Monism. In Dr. Kripal’s framework there is only "One Thing" (hence the monism). Underlying the fabric of reality is this singular, unified substrate.

We human beings, our consciousness acts like a prism, splitting that single reality into two distinct expressions - the dual-aspects. These are the mental (the inside of things, subjectivity, meaning, thought) and the material (the outside of things, physics, space, object). But they are the all same One Thing.

So I once some asked a pagan friend of mine, "Where do you think that ritual knife you're holding IS, exactly? Be specific." If he said, in the womb of the Goddess, I would agree. But it was just confusing to him.

I got what Lucian was saying. Your "stance" - and the worldview you hold, you family, the questions you ask, the degree of openness or rigidity you bring, how your body is feeling, whether you are angry, peevish, happy, horny, or depressed, and even the things in your environment, all of it is a dynamic, creative filter - your stance -that create your experiences. I like that word a lot too. It speaks to you are relating to the All. A "daimon" -the one you experience is ALL of that, in space-time.

So a daimon that is helpful to me may be poison to you. And vice versa. Your "stance" makes this so. Meaning all of the above. And in ritual your expectation mater, as well if you decide to use fire, hot peppers, and gunpowder - or honey, water, fine perfume and champagne. It’s not because these things are "feeding them energy" as neopagans think. The stuff IS them... and us in my view. Well, part of us. . We just get to choose what stuff to use, and what manifestation we get to have, because we humans are cool like that.

 

[Morell]

You have it out for neopagans and tiktokers just as much as I have it out for abrahamics.

Definitely you have very different angle or point of view that I have, so makes sense that while this seems obvious to you, it seems confusing to me. I still insist that standing is better term here, even when it includes physical presence, it's physical presence within a society. Even in "mystical rumbling" a mystic is trying to share something and to be understood. Not that it really works.

We all have some sort of vocabulary in our heads, that matches the terms with meaning basing on our own understanding and experience of the world. So no matter what you say, every term that people find in their internal vocabulary, they understand in their way, so if you want to reach out with something you get far better results with using vocabulary that is on others' heads. ... you are not copying knowledge from your head to theirs, you need to develop and grow knowledge within their heads... if you get the difference.

 

[MorganBlack]

Well, shit. Since were getting personal here.

Know this is not personal, so I will tell you what the do. The exact thing they do is a a mixed up confusion of Platonism and animism to make the worst version of both, excusing this giant "pagan" turducken as "folk magic."

For the other issues I will address. See the dynamic from Nassim Nicholas Taleb:
The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dictatorship of the Small Minority

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

These fragile tender-pagans. They sure can dish it out, but they can't take it. We were all friends, and it was all fine until some of them started attacking me and other Folk Catholics with sneers, slurs, and condescension. That was when I stopped being inclusive and decided I will not tolerate their bigotry.

When I accidentally found Neo-Nazi pagans on Signal and entire online communities filled to bursting with rotten anti-Jewish, anti-Catholic, anti-brown people sentiment, that's when I realized something had gone terribly wrong with the neopagan revivalism effort.

I support it in general, but come on. It is all fed by the same victim narrative. Talk about Nietzschean Ressentiment. The neopagan and pagan religion has become all about the weak complaining they are oppressed. It was supposed to be more than a hug-box.

Re "vocabulary." I agree with you. But it's so much more than that. That vocabulary is OUR vocabulary, the traditional magicians' vocabulary they are appropriating. The fact that they know very little about the Western magic tradition, nor our philosophical traditions, does not mean I have to concede the ground to them just because they outnumber me.

There's a deep end and shallow end to every pool, and they are the shallow end. Their own elders were smarter and less entitled. I knew many of them. So, I reject the consensus they made among themselves, and will not bow before the tyranny of intolerant religious extremists.

Post automatically merged: 21 minutes ago

Oh, just to add, here.

I will go to bat for anyone in any mythic framework they want to use. Just do try to play nice with others.

But this other shit, this is my red line. Please try to see it from my side.

The word "Abrahamist" has evolved over the past few years from a inaccurate and pretty hand-wavy term into a weaponized pagan extremist dog-whistle. Recently, in the past decade, it;s become used explicitly to strip away the cultural, historical, and ethnic distinctions of minority communities, lumping all of us into a single, hostile and mostly hallucinated monolithic boogie-man for white suburbanites.

've notice recently the work has become indicator of pagan radicalizationm so that if someone uses it i will suspect them of being an intolerant religious extremist, or possibly even a Neo-Nazi, until proven otherwise.

You have to try and see it from my Latino experience.

Our communities are directly in the crosshairs of this radicalized pagan hostility. Sure, Its' all fun and games and dancing getting blotted., but for us the downsides of this viewpoint are real.

Extremists are the ones burning down and vandalizing our churches. According to civil rights groups and hate-crime tracking by agencies like the FBI, Catholic houses of worship have faced a sharp escalation in targeted attacks over the last several years, with hundreds of incidents of arson, property destruction, and direct threats recorded annually across North America.

My son attends Mass at a church in Portland. OR. If you look at the pews, it's mostly elderly Polish octogenarians and many Latino families. Two years ago the FBI had to explicitly step in and warn the parish administration that domestic extremists were actively planning an attack on the church.

My son is a thorough-going Lefty Catholic, pro-working class, anti-war, as we tend to be. An you know what? He was more horrified to discover that the feds had moles and informants embedded inside the local community's activist networks , than he was about his own immediate safety. That is Catholic charity. Under duress that love of neighbor comes through.

In really real in-the-real-world reality of Portland pagans terrorizing my family or threatening the spaces where vulnerable people gather completely destroys any illusion of an "inclusive" pagan spirituality. This intersection of far-right "folkish" ideology, eco-fascism, and aggressive online radicalization on platforms like Signal has mutated into sort a dangerous entitlement, hallucination over fake-lore history, and hysteria.

By all accounts, and my own actions, I am a terrible Catholic. I am by far less a much less nice person than the more mainstream Catholics are, and I refuse to "turn the other cheek" and cede cultural, spiritual, or physical ground to extremists hiding behind a hijacked "pagan" vocabulary. Just.

Try to be better. That's all I ask.