- Joined
- Aug 17, 2023
- Messages
- 2,992
- Reaction score
- 3,707
- Awards
- 16
As used by Michael Webb, the phrase refers to an author/mage's inventing flamboyant background for himself as a way of garnering attention. Webb thus excuses Anton LaVey's claim to have shagged Marilyn Monroe. So too does Kenneth Grant do some special pleading for Madame Blavatsky's known truth-tailoring. Evola---not a forgiving man---winked at Crowley's "showmanship."
One question here is whether there is anything magickally viable about doing this? To mine jaundiced eye, indulging the cheese factor is marketing, (im)pure and simple. One might attract attention, but the next step seems to be disenchantment. It's like seduction: when your date finds out your Corvette is a cheap-plastic chassis on a VW bug's frame, she's going to wonder what other claims are inflated. Second, the mage would seem to need to ask himself whether he wants to attract pupils who are thusly forgiving of crass deceptions.
So, is there a more forgiving but still viable way of looking at the cheese? I recall Miguel Serrano broke with Nimrod De Rosario because the latter wrote "historical fiction" which genre Serrano took as "spreading lies." That's harsh, but why not be so in the case at hand?
One question here is whether there is anything magickally viable about doing this? To mine jaundiced eye, indulging the cheese factor is marketing, (im)pure and simple. One might attract attention, but the next step seems to be disenchantment. It's like seduction: when your date finds out your Corvette is a cheap-plastic chassis on a VW bug's frame, she's going to wonder what other claims are inflated. Second, the mage would seem to need to ask himself whether he wants to attract pupils who are thusly forgiving of crass deceptions.
So, is there a more forgiving but still viable way of looking at the cheese? I recall Miguel Serrano broke with Nimrod De Rosario because the latter wrote "historical fiction" which genre Serrano took as "spreading lies." That's harsh, but why not be so in the case at hand?