Hey, how do you view the witches’ devil? I’d like to share my perspective on this concept with you, and I’d like you to tell me whether you agree with me or not, why, and how you see it. In my opinion, the witches’ devil can be viewed in two ways.
1. A single power/entity with many faces, appearing in different parts of the world in various forms, under different names, etc.; it is multidimensional but singular—for example, Bucca, the King of Elfame, the Man in Black, and Cain are its faces, but all these figures are one and the same being. I’ve noticed this approach while reading books on the craft, and I know there are people who view it this way.
2. A title for many distinct spirits; in this case, we view the aforementioned figures as distinct, and we can use the title “devil” to refer to many spirits—for example, in the folklore of my country, witches collaborated with many distinct devils who were fully individual and often acted more like familiars, and during the sabbath, many devils appeared—not just one—and they were mainly derived from ancient Slavic demons.
Personally, I believe that “devil” can be a term for many spirits one can work with, but I also think it’s possible to work with a single multidimensional devil—the Old One—an archetypal being. What do you think about that??? I’m very curious. Actually, if you have extensive knowledge about the devil in traditional witchcraft, could you recommend some books and describe where he came from and who created him in traditional witchcraft? It seems to me that the concept of the devil in this tradition stems from Robert Cochrane.
1. A single power/entity with many faces, appearing in different parts of the world in various forms, under different names, etc.; it is multidimensional but singular—for example, Bucca, the King of Elfame, the Man in Black, and Cain are its faces, but all these figures are one and the same being. I’ve noticed this approach while reading books on the craft, and I know there are people who view it this way.
2. A title for many distinct spirits; in this case, we view the aforementioned figures as distinct, and we can use the title “devil” to refer to many spirits—for example, in the folklore of my country, witches collaborated with many distinct devils who were fully individual and often acted more like familiars, and during the sabbath, many devils appeared—not just one—and they were mainly derived from ancient Slavic demons.
Personally, I believe that “devil” can be a term for many spirits one can work with, but I also think it’s possible to work with a single multidimensional devil—the Old One—an archetypal being. What do you think about that??? I’m very curious. Actually, if you have extensive knowledge about the devil in traditional witchcraft, could you recommend some books and describe where he came from and who created him in traditional witchcraft? It seems to me that the concept of the devil in this tradition stems from Robert Cochrane.