- Joined
- Aug 12, 2021
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 92
- Awards
- 3
As the thread title states, do you have any recommendations.
The older the better but I'll check out anything.
The older the better but I'll check out anything.
Lol I only just realized, well I was rushing to create this thread before I went to sleep.You mean Tulpa I guess.there's a typo in the headline.
Tulpa Creation Guide by E Steinbach
The Adventures of A Modern Occultist by Oliver Bland 1920
Egregores by Mark Stavish James Wasserman
I recommend beginning with "Egregores" to have a good understanding of the subject. Then you may proceed as you like; with caution as always
Thank you for the advice, I'll definitely read it first, already downloaded it.I recommend beginning with "Egregores" to have a good understanding of the subject. Then you may proceed as you like; with caution as always
Thanks for the tip I guess, but this just sounds like the "larp magicians" I was talking about in my first thread on this site, the people I'm trying to avoid lol. Where magic is a "fun pastime" for them and they don't care about the results, they just care about "the experience".The Newkirk‘s (same couple that did Hellier) is doing an experiment related to egregors on their Traveling Museum Patreon called the haunted ramen experiment. It’s meant to be fun and goofy while testing the fact that we sometimes create these entities ourselves. Can’t help with book recs tho.
Whether you like them or not, they and a bunch of their Patreon members are actually doing an experiment, which I’m guessing is probably more then 90% of the people who will respond here. They are goofy sometimes, but I wouldn’t say they don’t take it seriously. If human beings are able to create thought forms, this seems to be a fine way to test the theory with a reduced risk of anyone actually getting hurt. Anyways, I just thought it was interesting that a group of people were literally trying to create an egregor, in a fun and accessible way (which in itself will piss some people off, because SECRETS).Why would I take anyone like that seriously.
I think I'm going to need something that is closer to the source anyways, I did some searching and it turned out wellWhether you like them or not, they and a bunch of their Patreon members are actually doing an experiment, which I’m guessing is probably more then 90% of the people who will respond here. They are goofy sometimes, but I wouldn’t say they don’t take it seriously. If human beings are able to create thought forms, this seems to be a fine way to test the theory with a reduced risk of anyone actually getting hurt. Anyways, I just thought it was interesting that a group of people were literally trying to create an egregor, in a fun and accessible way (which in itself will piss some people off, because SECRETS).
May I ask why do you trust the writings of Mark Stavish and James Wasserman?
Was it recommended by a trusted source or did you personally verify its usefulness?
The book (Egregores) seems to have been published in 2018. All modern information isn't by default "watered down" or "fake", but the more recent the material is the more I doubt it's veracity at first glance.
I said that modern information ISN'T by default "watered down" or "fake" (in other words, it probably is accurate), but I personally don't trust it as much as the older books.I do not agree. But do whatever you like.![]()
I saw what you mean and added the credentials of the writer. Not for you really, but for future readers, who may have an interest in new books too.I said that modern information ISN'T by default "watered down" or "fake" (in other words, it probably is accurate), but I personally don't trust it as much as the older books.
This is your opinion but I may not agree; it's a kind of generalization and like all generalizations, it's not for me.these new books are usually just people parroting the same information from older books and repackaging it for the modern era