Which of the afterlife/afterdeath theory seems most plausible?

[mettalph]

I've recently experienced the loss of some loved ones, which has rekindled my curiosity about possible theories of the afterlife. I've studied everything from Bardo Thodol, Theosophy, Gnosticism, and Kardecism. And I've noticed that they all share many similarities, despite their clear differences.

What caught my attention most is that they all consider, to some degree, the illusory nature of experience, where, in theory, all experience is a creation of the observer's consciousness. In this way, just as physical life can be influenced by consciousness, the afterlife could also be. And the ultimate goal is to break free from the shackles of illusion to conduct the experience consciously, making death a kind of simulation, just like life.

Does this make any sense? Could it be the synthesis of physical life and spiritual/afterlife life, a repetitive cycle of struggle to escape the prison of consciousness?

Or is there actually a system, an organization, similar to physical life, in spiritual life where we also need to live experiences and overcome challenges?

 

[iseht]

There is something magical about attention. The direction of ones awareness is what fueled rebirth in ancient Indian metaphysics. A devatta living in a tree is there because a man passed away with his mind set in reverie on that tree. Just about every spiritual path can more or less be reduced to a path of purification that unburdens one's attention such that it can be placed into a state of perfect union. As for the ontological structure, who can say, but I think this much is probably true and is a portable enough philosophy to hold value in any system.

 

[Suayakoat]

I personally think both life and death are two sides of the same coin named existence. In the first case you exist in order to cease to exist and we call that life, while in the second case you cease to exist in order to reincarnate and exist again and we call it death. I know that decoding my words may seem strange (to put it at least) in the first place but the important thing is there is something transcendental about existence (and the existence of the soul to be more precise) per se-it just never stops. It can only mutate into it merging with its Creator or it becoming an advanced Creator on its ow but the sheer existence of the soul never stop itself-it just transforms from lifetime to lifetime. And I suppose is the ultimate truth you have been searching for.

 

[PagesJ]

Despite being inexperienced with it, there probably isn't a simple answer to this, where we only can continue living to find out at the end of our journey we will probably have our own answers.

 

[Ananda]

I've recently experienced the loss of some loved ones, which has rekindled my curiosity about possible theories of the afterlife. I've studied everything from Bardo Thodol, Theosophy, Gnosticism, and Kardecism. And I've noticed that they all share many similarities, despite their clear differences.

Theosophy stole everything from everywhere, mixed incompatible systems and worldviews, added some 19th century racism and self aggrandizing lies of some German orientalists. Not surprising that you find that it shares similarities with other things.

 

[HoldAll]

What's after death?

What do you believe happens after death? Rebirth on Earth as a new human? Rebirth on Earth as a different species? Rebirth on a different plane/dimension? Continuing on in a different plane/dimension? Like heaven or hell... Continuing on in a parallel universe where you never died... on and...

wizardforums.com