- Joined
- Jun 17, 2025
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 1
Now that my pause in responses forced you to take a time out after your predictable reflexive response, maybe you spent some time contemplating the matter and sorted your emotions.
My explanation for my metaphysics regarding the nature of demons does none of the accusations you're making. Gatekeeping? That accusation doesn't even make sense. That with the others are all a projection of your imagination which you're reacting emotionally to. In a sense you're lashing out at your own imagined demons. Letting them control what you see and how you respond. Which is simply being contrarian. You've shown no indication of having any more than a googled in the moment understanding about what you're talking about.
However, if you made your own post where you set down independently your well considered metaphysics about the nature of demons, that will show your understanding and help others, like myself, gain insight into what you're talking about.
The thread topic is about demons specifically, not spirits in general. If there is a distinction for you, as there is for others
You haven’t actually explained your position in any real way. You’ve dodged nearly every direct question I’ve asked and instead layered your responses with vague language and passive-aggressive jabs about my emotions, understanding, and “reflexes.”
You say I’m being reactive and projecting, but that feels like a distraction from the fact that you still haven’t actually clarified what you mean. You accuse me of making assumptions, but so far, you’ve assumed I’m emotional, that I didn’t think through what I’m saying, that I’m reacting to “imagined demons,” that I only googled things in the moment, and that I lack insight....all without even asking what I’ve read, experienced, or actually believe.
This isn't about ego. I’m here because I want to understand other people’s metaphysics. I literally asked you to clarify. Instead, I’ve gotten generalities, sidesteps, and then a wall of accusations directed at me instead of the topic.
And honestly, if your theory really is strong and well thought out, you wouldn’t need to bury it under condescension or psychoanalysis of the person asking questions. You’d just explain it. I still don’t know what you actually believe demons are, outside of vague references to “bios,” “zoe,” and “alignment,” all of which you’ve refused to define clearly. I wasn’t trying to strawman — I was trying to understand.
If you really believe what you’re saying, then explain it. I’m not here to argue for the sake of arguing. But I’m also not going to pretend you’ve said something meaningful when you haven’t.