- Joined
- Apr 28, 2021
- Messages
- 658
- Reaction score
- 1,534
- Awards
- 13
What do you guys think? I’ve been wrestling with this question for awhile, I’m interested in some different opinions.
I suppose that's a good litmus implied in the above: if you learn something from the character, s/he's conscious, a real being, or however you like to phrase it. Quite possibly there are different sorts of beings peopling our dreams.Taking it from my understanding of psychology then you could say yes they are conscious but only in the sense that it is you consciousness reflected back at you. They can also be seen as symbolic representations of deeper layers of yourself, that is, the "subconscious" made manifest. They could just be masks of impulses or unprocessed information, or Jungian archetypes signaling some change in the inner self.
Yet I believe in a kind of telepathy in dreams (or a level of astral operation) where it is a shared experience of more than one mind thinking it is only their dream. These are probably seen from different idiosyncratic perspectives by different dreamers. People who show up are real people who don't know or recognize each other and nobody knows what's going on. But it is possible to know and to recognize. It kind of sucks when someone does know because they might not be pleasant to deal with.
Then there are visitations of spirits in dreams, but these have a tendency to transform the dream into another unique level. These are the kinds that I wake up from somewhat paranoid because they are often really dramatic and make me wonder what it meant and what happens next. Typically something does and it relates to the dream - but never as dramatic as the dream itself.
Maybe its not really different than a game, whereas all characters a NPC's technically but some might be avatars of something else behind? Same as your character.What do you guys think? I’ve been wrestling with this question for awhile, I’m interested in some different opinions.
My oldest niece was always "not remembering" to do her homework and her mom assumed the lass was autonomous, if not precisely honest. But, yeah, one could make a case the daughter was a slave to TV and her friend's bad examples. (Hall of mirrors there: friends reinforcing bad behavior that seems to belong to all jointly, none severally.) I suppose one can cite this as evidence that we flesh and blood characters pass lives like dream ones. Like Tokugawa Ieyasu said, "Even winning at Sekigahara Pass and building Osaka Castle were but a dream within a dream."I mentioned in my lucid dreaming post that I asked one of the people in my dream what their name was, and they replied "I don't remember" which seems a pretty good sign that this particular dream person, at least, was not really autonomous.
I think they are more likely to be your dream expectations of what you think other people should act like, just like you have simulation models of your friends when you say "oh yeah, I'm pretty sure X would do this in this situation"
Also, this reminded me that a common reaction to the discovery of magic (i.e. that reality is manipulable by thought) is to assume that the universe is an illusion (or indeed a dream state)I suppose one can cite this as evidence that we flesh and blood characters pass lives like dream ones. Like Tokugawa Ieyasu said, "Even winning at Sekigahara Pass and building Osaka Castle were but a dream within a dream."
I largely agree except there are plenty of exceptions where dream characters act in a very surprising way and autonomous seeming way. The case of Carl Jung's dream 'guide' Philemon is an interesting one. I don't think a case can be made for an argument of consciousness applied to a normal person that can't also be applied to a dream character.I think they are more likely to be your dream expectations of what you think other people should act like, just like you have simulation models of your friends when you say "oh yeah, I'm pretty sure X would do this in this situation"
It's hard to say.What do you guys think? I’ve been wrestling with this question for awhile, I’m interested in some different opinions.
Illusion as compared to what, though? It seems the guy reacting is being pretty picky. First the guy wants to manipulate reality by thought. When he's successful, instead of being happy at his success, he grouses, "Reality ain't real enough!" Reminds me of an old Down South saying, "She's the kind of woman all Hell couldn't amuse."I suppose I was assuming that everything in dreams is representative of something about oneself - in this case, my subconscious clearly couldn't be bothered to make up any details
Post automatically merged:
Also, this reminded me that a common reaction to the discovery of magic (i.e. that reality is manipulable by thought) is to assume that the universe is an illusion (or indeed a dream state)
I always wondered that myself, although I was reminded recently that 'illusion' doesn't mean 'doesn't exist' but 'things are not what they seem', in which case, maybe it refers to the fact that our perceptions (after such heavy processing and massive data filtering) bear little resemblance to whatever the actual object was that we were perceiving.Illusion as compared to what, though?
Yukio Mishima somewhere or other goes onto this long disquisition about the moon in a mirror reflecting from the image in a bowl of water set on a windowsill as the clouds part one night. I imagine that is a pretty far cry from what Neil Armstrong trod on. So the exact status of dream characters might well be hard to nail down. Us too.I always wondered that myself, although I was reminded recently that 'illusion' doesn't mean 'doesn't exist' but 'things are not what they seem', in which case, maybe it refers to the fact that our perceptions (after such heavy processing and massive data filtering) bear little resemblance to whatever the actual object was that we were perceiving.
i.e. our perceptions are not built to see things as they really are, they are built to stop us being eaten by leopards...