Clarify the highlighted terms.Well, you didn't understand about the transmutation into a higher subtle body, which is the apex of esoteric development.
According to what standard?
You do realize any claim of any sort about occult effects can be said to lack sufficient evidence? If you combed through your posts you would find cases where you make various claims that do not have evidentiary backing to the standard you are attempting to apply to the one case you don't like. That would be its own fallacy of special pleading.
You've surely made claims here that involve occult forces. Why don't you hold yourself to the same standard? lol You're full of shit, in other words.
The problem is that the lemmings of the occult world can't assimilate the fact that they've wasted years soaking in egregoric energies and not truly developing themselves.
I already answered this to another poster. If I said something about 'chakras', you wouldn't ask me to define the term.
The higher subtle body has plenty of references in esoteric tradition. If you're too dim to grasp this, it is not my problem.
Post automatically merged:
Look, if you want to be in denial about what Mark Stavish wrote, that's up to you.
Anyone who can comprehend basic English can read it and decide for themselves, Pg 11
The problem is that the lemmings of the occult world can't assimilate the fact that they've wasted years soaking in egregoric energies and not truly developing themselves.
Is the English on pg 11 not comprehensible to you? I can't help you.
It is extremely foolish to believe that these energies are not a part and parcel of the 'outward cultural form'. There is no separation, they are all intermingled egregoric energies.
Yes, we know esoteric mysteries ought to be comprehended by 5th graders., I'm asking you to rephrase this exact sentence so that it could be read and understood by a 5th grader,
Well, once again you didn't understand, while proving my point. Maybe you should ask AI to compose your responses.A very general and well understood standard . Do I have to educate you on it and the why of it ?
What are you talking about ? ANY thing I write on an internet forum doesnt have sufficent evidence of proof . How stupid ! For all you know I might present as a beutiful young witch ... yet I am actually a a fat underwear clad guy sitting in his apartment in Russia copying and posting someone's blog .
He uttered similar thoughts that we find Regardie stating here.From page 10 (not 11) of Israel Regardie & The Philosopher's Stone by Lisewski:
"I bring up Santee because he ran in many of the same circles as Regardie. Crowley, and Frater Albertus and was a contemporary of theirs and it is said that he met the first two men when in London . Yet like Albertus at the end of his days, when the lodge he had built and put so much energy into was going to meet its ultimate test of being able to survive without its founder, he uttered similar thoughts that we find Regardie stating here . If he had to do it all over again. Santee said he would forget magic and focus only on making money. As a physician Santee had a comfortable life, but it is also clear, that for all his occult skill and talent, in the end. he believed that the results did not justify the time and energy he put into it."
This is a quote which Stavish is attributing to Santee, not to Regardie. And having combed through Regardie's work I don't find anything like this at all. Be my guest and try to find it before repeating this nonsense any further. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
They should be communicable to a 5th grader, certainly. I am not asking you to explain your entire magical philosophy. I am asking whether or not you are capable of rendering this jargon-heavy sentence into something a person could grasp without words like "transmutation" and "higher subtle body."Yes, we know esoteric mysteries ought to be comprehended by 5th graders.
Great, it's now time to find what that something similar is and show the class. This is YOUR argument. You've been repeating it for years. You should have more to go on than just this one thing, or were you unable to read the actual book?Yes, we know esoteric mysteries ought to be comprehended by 5th graders.
Well, once again you didn't understand, while proving my point. Maybe you should ask AI to compose your responses.
Post automatically merged:
He uttered similar thoughts that we find Regardie stating here.
He's saying Regardie expressed similiar thoughts to what Santee said. There is no other possible meaning to that sentence.
So you claim to be well-versed in the Golden Dawn, and yet you have never had an OBE?I don't believe in a subtle body,
Yes, we know esoteric mysteries ought to be comprehended by 5th graders.
Well, once again you didn't understand, while proving my point. Maybe you should ask AI to compose your responses.
Post automatically merged:
He uttered similar thoughts that we find Regardie stating here.
He's saying Regardie expressed similiar thoughts to what Santee said. There is no other possible meaning to that sentence.
Probably not the thread for it...So you claim to be well-versed in the Golden Dawn, and yet you have never had an OBE?
So you claim to be well-versed in the Golden Dawn, and yet you have never had an OBE?
What mistake? Some of you are disliking what the book written by Regardie's close associate said. Not my problem.But you will NOT be able to admit your mistake .
Exactly . you could have had a similar expereince and attributed to things beyond 'above all's' somprehensive universe .Probably not the thread for it...
I do not believe that OBE have anything to do with souls, astral bodies, subtle bodies, spirit bodies, or anything remotely like that.
So, as I said- you lack experience. Unsurprising.I do not believe that OBE have anything to do with souls, astral bodies, subtle bodies, spirit bodies, or anything remotely like that.
Wrong , What we are disliking is you and your dishonest approach here . It would not be so bad if it wasn't so transparently obvious ! Its just a series of complex ego tactics that many of us are ............ beyond .What mistake? Some of you are disliking what the book written by Regardie's close associate said. Not my problem.
What mistake? Some of you are disliking what the book written by Regardie's close associate said. Not my problem.
again ... He answers with a put down and a masked elevation of himself . While all the unanswered issues build up .So, as I said- you lack experience. Unsurprising.
Let me rerphrase..... despite having several Out of Body Experiences - notably after being in a car accident and getting a major head injury - I see absolutely no reason to assert the existence of a body, or anything like a body, through which these events take place.So, as I said- you lack experience. Unsurprising.
lol get a gripWrong , What we are disliking is you
Well, I'm sorry for your accident, but this is not exactly practicing an esoteric discipline. Id say you are unexperienced.notably after being in a car accident and getting a major head injury
That was more than 30 years ago. Do I need to list every OBE individually, to distinguish between which ones were produced through which methods? As I said, this is not the thread for it. But we can make that thread if you like.Well, I'm sorry for your accident, but this is not exactly practicing an esoteric discipline. Id say you are unexperienced.
I mean you said 'several'. So that is approximately 6 at most. So it's not 'never', but it's sure close to it.That was more than 30 years ago. Do I need to list every OBE individually, to distinguish between which ones were produced through which methods? As I said, this is not the thread for it. But we can make that thread if you like.
lol get a grip